Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net 1023-5809 1607-7946 13 1 2006 10.5194/npg-13-53-2006 http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/13/53/2006/ http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/13/53/2006/npg-13-53-2006.html http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/13/53/2006/npg-13-53-2006.pdf 53 66 2006-03-24 Application of the LEPS technique for Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting (QPF) in Southern Italy: a preliminary study S. Federico s.federico@crati.it E. Avolio C. Bellecci M. Colacino R. L. Walko CRATI Scrl, c/o University of Calabria, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy CNR-ISAC, via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 100, 00133 Rome, Italy University of Rome "Tor Vergata" Dept. STFE, via del Politecnico, 1, 00133 Rome, Italy Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA This paper reports preliminary results for a Limited area model Ensemble Prediction System (LEPS), based on RAMS (Regional Atmospheric Modelling System), for eight case studies of moderate-intense precipitation over Calabria, the southernmost tip of the Italian peninsula. LEPS aims to transfer the benefits of a probabilistic forecast from global to regional scales in countries where local orographic forcing is a key factor to force convection. <br /><br /> To accomplish this task and to limit computational time in an operational implementation of LEPS, we perform a cluster analysis of ECMWF-EPS runs. Starting from the 51&nbsp;members that form the ECMWF-EPS we generate five clusters. For each cluster a representative member is selected and used to provide initial and dynamic boundary conditions to RAMS, whose integrations generate LEPS. RAMS runs have 12-km horizontal resolution. <br /><br /> To analyze the impact of enhanced horizontal resolution on quantitative precipitation forecasts, LEPS forecasts are compared to a full Brute Force (BF) ensemble. This ensemble is based on RAMS, has 36 km horizontal resolution and is generated by 51&nbsp;members, nested in each ECMWF-EPS member. <br /><br /> LEPS and BF results are compared subjectively and by objective scores. Subjective analysis is based on precipitation and probability maps of case studies whereas objective analysis is made by deterministic and probabilistic scores. Scores and maps are calculated by comparing ensemble precipitation forecasts against reports from the Calabria regional raingauge network. <br /><br /> Results show that LEPS provided better rainfall predictions than BF for all case studies selected. This strongly suggests the importance of the enhanced horizontal resolution, compared to ensemble population, for Calabria for these cases. <br /><br /> To further explore the impact of local physiographic features on QPF (Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting), LEPS results are also compared with a 6-km horizontal resolution deterministic forecast. Due to local and mesoscale forcing, the high resolution forecast (Hi-Res) has better performance compared to the ensemble mean for rainfall thresholds larger than 10mm but it tends to overestimate precipitation for lower amounts. This yields larger false alarms that have a detrimental effect on objective scores for lower thresholds. <br /><br /> To exploit the advantages of a probabilistic forecast compared to a deterministic one, the relation between the ECMWF-EPS 700 hPa geopotential height spread and LEPS performance is analyzed. Results are promising even if additional studies are required. Baldwin, M. E.: QPF verification system documentation, http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/ylin/pcpverif/scores/docs/mbdoc/pptmethod.html, 2000. Brooks, H. E., Doswell, C. A., and Maddox, R. A.: On the use of mesoscale and cloud-scale model in operational forecasting, Wea. Forecasting, 7, 120-132, 1992. Colle, B. A., Mass, C. F., and Westrick, K. J.: MM5 precipitation verification over the Pacific Northwest during the 1997-99 cool seasons, Wea. Forecasting, 15, 137-154, 2000. Cotton, W. R., Pielke, R. A. Sr., Walko, R. L., Liston, G. E., Tremback, C. J., Jiang, H., McAnelly, R. L., Harrington, J. Y., Nicholls, M. E., Carrio, G. G., and McFadden, J. P.: RAMS 2001: Current status and future directions, Meteor. Atm., 82, 5-29, 2003. Federico, S., Bellecci, C., and Colacino, M.: Quantitative precipitation of the Soverato flood: the role of orography and surface fluxes. Nuov. Cim. C , 26 C, 7-22, 2003. Federico, S., Avolio, E., Bellecci, C., Colacino, M., Lavagnini, A., Accadia C., Mariani, S., and Casaioli, M.: Three model intercomparison for quantitative precipitation forecast over Calabria. Nuov. Cim. C, 26 C, 627-647, 2004. Houtemaker, P. L. and Derome, J.: Methods for ensemble prediction, Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 2181-2196, 1995. Houtemaker, P. L., Derome, J., Ritchie, H., and Mitchell, H. L.: A systematic simulation approach to ensemble prediction, Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 1429-1443, 1996. Leith, C. E.: Theoretical skill of Monte Carlo forecasts, Mon. Wea. Rev., 102, 409-418, 1974. Marsigli, C., Montani, A., Nerozzi, F., Paccagnella, T., Tibaldi, S., Molteni, F., and Buizza, R.: A strategy for high-resolution ensemble prediction, Part II: limited-area model experiments in four Alpine flood events, Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 2095-2115, 2001. Mason, S. J. and Graham, N. E.: Conditional probabilities, relative operating characteristics and relative operating levels, Wea. Forecasting, 14, 713-725, 1999. Mass, C. F., Ovens, D., Westrick, K., and Colle, B. A.: Does increasing horizontal resolution produce more skilful forecast ? Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 83, 407-430, 2002. Molinari, J. and Corsetti, T.: Incorporation of cloud-scale and mesoscale down-drafts into a cumulus parametrization: results of one and three-dimensional integrations, Mon. Wea. Rev., 113, 485-501, 1985. Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Marsigli, C., Montani, A., Nerozzi, F., and Paccagnella, T.: The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System: Methodology and validation, Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 73-119, 1996. Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Marsigli, C., Montani, A., Nerozzi, F., and Paccagnella, T.: A strategy for high-resolution ensemble prediction, Part I: definition of representative members and global model experiments, Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 2069-2094, 2001. Montani, A., Marsigli, C., Nerozzi, F., Paccagnella, T., Tibaldi, S., and Buizza, R.: The Soverato flood in Southern Italy: performance of a global and limited-area ensemble forecasts, Nonlin. Proc. Geophys., 10, 261-274, 2003. Pielke, R. A., Cotton, W. R., Walko, R. L., Tremback, C. J., Lyons, W. A., Grasso, L. D., Nicholls, M. E., Murran, M. D., Wesley, D. A., Lee, T. H., and Copeland, J. H.: A comprehensive meteorological modelling system-RAMS, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 49, 69-91, 1992. Smith, R. B.: The influence of mountains on the atmosphere, Advances in Geophysics, 21, Academic Press, 87-230, 1979. Stanski, H. R., Wilson, L. J., and Burrows, W. R.: Survey of common verification methods in meteorology. WMO World Weather Watch Tech. Report, 8, 1989. Toth, Z. and Kalnay, E.: Ensemble forecasting at NMC: the generation of perturbations, Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 125, 2317-2330, 1994. Toth, Z. and Kalnay, E.: Ensemble forecasting at NCEP and the breeding method, Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 3297-3319, 1997. Walko, R. L., Tremback, C. J., Pielke, R. A., and Cotton, W. R: An interactive nesting algorithm for stretched and variable nesting ratio, J. Appl. Met., 34, 994-999, 1994. Walko, R. L., Cotton, W. R., Meyers, M. P., and Harrington, J. Y.: New RAMS cloud microphysics parameterization part I: the single-moment scheme, Atmos. Research, 38, 29-62, 1995. Walko, R. L., Band, L. E., Baron, J., Kittel, T. G., Lammers, R., Lee, T. J., Ojima, D., Pielke, R. A. Sr., Taylor, C., Tague, C., Tremback, C. J., and Vidale, P. L.: Coupled Atmosphere-Biosphere-Hydrology Models for environmental prediction, J. Appl. Met., 39, 931-944, 2000. Wilks, D. S.: Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 1995.