<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/inc/npg/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Nonlinear Processes  in Geophysics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1023-5809</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7946</eissn>
		<volume_number>15</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/npg-15-209-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/15/209/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/15/209/2008/npg-15-209-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/15/209/2008/npg-15-209-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>209</start_page>
	<end_page>220</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-02-27</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Transformation of frequency-magnitude relation prior to large events in the model of block structure dynamics</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>A. Soloviev</name>
			<email>soloviev@mitp.ru</email>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">International Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">ESP, The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The &lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;-value change in the frequency-magnitude (FM)
distribution for a synthetic earthquake catalogue obtained by means of the
model of block structure dynamics has been studied. The catalogue is divided
into time periods preceding strong earthquakes and time periods that do not
precede strong earthquakes. The separate analysis of these periods shows
that the &lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;-value is smaller before strong earthquakes. The similar phenomenon
has been found also for the observed seismicity of the Southern California.
The model of block structure dynamics represents a seismic region as a
system of perfectly rigid blocks divided by infinitely thin plane faults.
The blocks interact between themselves and with the underlying medium. The
system of blocks moves as a consequence of prescribed motion of the boundary
blocks and of the underlying medium. As the blocks are perfectly rigid, all
deformation takes place in the fault zones and at the block base in contact
with the underlying medium. Relative block displacements take place along
the fault zones. Block motion is defined so that the system is in a
quasistatic equilibrium state. The interaction of blocks along the fault
zones is viscous-elastic (&quot;normal state&quot;) while the ratio of the stress to
the pressure remains below a certain strength level. When the critical level
is exceeded in some part of a fault zone, a stress-drop (&quot;failure&quot;) occurs
(in accordance with the dry friction model), possibly causing failure in
other parts of the fault zones. These failures produce earthquakes.
Immediately after the earthquake and for some time after, the affected parts
of the fault zones are in a state of creep. This state differs from the
normal state because of a faster growth of inelastic displacements, lasting
until the stress falls below some other level. This numerical simulation
gives rise a synthetic earthquake catalogue.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Aki, K.: Maximum likelihood estimate of b in formula log N=a&amp;ndash;b M and its confidence limits, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 43, 237&amp;ndash;239, 1965. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Allègre, C. J., Le Mou\&quot;el, J.-L., and Provost, A.: Scaling rules in rock fracture and possible implications for earthquake prediction, Nature, 297, 47&amp;ndash;49, 1982. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Allègre, C. J., Le Mou\&quot;el, J.-L., Chau, H. D., and Narteau, C.: Scaling organization of fracture tectonics (SOFT) and earthquake mechanism, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 92, 215&amp;ndash;233, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Amelung, F. and King, G.: Earthquake scaling laws for creeping and noncreeping faults, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 507&amp;ndash;510, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Amitrano, D.: Brittle-ductile transition and associated seismicity: Experimental and numerical studies and relationship with the $b$ value, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 2044, doi:10.1029/2001JB000680, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Bak, P. and Tang, C.: Earthquakes as a self-organized critical phenomenon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 94, 15 635&amp;ndash;15 637, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Barenblatt, G. I, Keilis-Borok, V. I, and Monin, A. S.: Filtration model of earthquake sequence, Transactions (Doklady) Acad. Sci. SSSR, 269, 831&amp;ndash;834, 1983. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Ben-Zion, Y. and Rice, J. R.: Earthquake failure sequence along a cellurar fault zone in a three-dimensional elastic solid containing asperity and nonasperity regions, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 14 109&amp;ndash;14 131, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Ben-Zion, Y. and Lyakhovsky, V.: Analysis of aftershocks in a lithospheric model with seismogenic zone governed by damage rheology, Geophys. J. Int., 165, 197&amp;ndash;210, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Blanter, E. M., Shnirman, M. G., and Le Mou\&quot;el, J.-L.: Hierarchical model of seismicity: Scaling and predictability, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 103, 135&amp;ndash;150, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Burridge, R. and Knopoff, L.: Model and theoretical seismicity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 57, 341&amp;ndash;360, 1967. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Burroughs, S. M. and Tebbens, S. F.: The upper-truncated power law applied to earthquake cumulative frequency-magnitude distributions: evidence for a time-independent scaling parameter, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 92, 2983&amp;ndash;2993, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Christensen, K. and Olami, Z.: Variation of the Gutenberg-Richter $b$ values and nontrivial temporal correlations in a spring-block model for earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 8729&amp;ndash;8735, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Dieterich, J. H.: Time-dependent friction as a possible mechanism for aftershocks, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 3771&amp;ndash;3781, 1972. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Dieterich, J. H.: A constitutive law for earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 2601&amp;ndash;2618, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Eneva, M. and Ben-Zion, Y.: Techniques and parameters to analyze seismicity patterns associated with large earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 17 785&amp;ndash;17 795, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Fitzenz, D. D. and Miller, S. A.: A forward model for earthquake generation on interacting faults including tectonics, fluids, and stress transfer, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 26 689&amp;ndash;26 706, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Gabrielov, A. M. and Keilis-Borok, V. I.: Patterns of stress corrosion: Geometry of the principal stresses, Pure Appl. Geophys., 121, 477&amp;ndash;494, 1983. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Gabrielov, A. M., Levshina, T. A., and Rotwain, I. M.: Block model of earthquake sequence, Phys. Earth and Planet. Inter., 61, 18&amp;ndash;28, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Gabrielov, A. M., Keilis-Borok, V.I., Zaliapin, I. V., and Newman, W. I.: Critical transitions in colliding cascades, Phys. Rev. E, 62, 237&amp;ndash;249, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Gutenberg, R. and Richter, C. F.: Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 34, 185&amp;ndash;188, 1944. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Ishimoto, M. and Iida, K.: Observations on earthquakes registered with the microseismograph constructed recently, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 17, 443&amp;ndash;478, 1939. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Ismail-Zadeh A., Le Mou\&quot;el, J.-L., Soloviev, A., Tapponnier, P., and Vorovieva, I.: Numerical modeling of crustal block-and-fault dynamics, earthquakes and slip rates in the Tibet-Himalayan region, EPSL, 258, 465&amp;ndash;485, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Ito, K. and Matsuzaki, M.: Earthquakes as self-organized critical phenomena, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 6853&amp;ndash;6860, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Hainzl, S., Zöller, G., and Kurths, J.: Similar power laws for fore- and aftershock sequences in a spring-block model for earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 7243&amp;ndash;7253, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Henderson, J., Main, I., Meredith, P., and Sammonds, P.: The evolution of seismicity at Parkfield: observation, experiment and a fracture-mechanical interpretation, J. Struct. Geol., 14, 905&amp;ndash;913, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Henderson, J., Main, I. G., Pearce, R. G., and Takeya, M.: Seismicity in north-eastern Brazil: fractal clustering and the evolution of the $b$ value, Geophys. J. Int., 116, 217&amp;ndash;226, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Keilis-Borok, V. I. and Kossobokov, V. G.: Premonitory activation of earthquake flow: algorithm M8, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 61, 73&amp;ndash;83, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Keilis-Borok, V. I., Rotwain, I. M., and Soloviev, A. A.: Numerical modeling of block structure dynamics: dependence of a synthetic earthquake flow on the structure separateness and boundary movements, J. Seismol., 1, 151&amp;ndash;160, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Main, I. G., Meredith, P. G., and Jones, C.: A reinterpretation of the precursory seismic $b$-value anomaly from fracture mechanics, Geophys. J. Int., 96, 131&amp;ndash;138, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Main, I. G., Meredith, P. G., and Sammonds, P. R.: Temporal variations in seismic event rate and $b$-values from stress corrosion constitutive laws, Tectonophysics, 211, 233&amp;ndash;246, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Molchan, G. M. and Podgaetskaya, V. M.: Parameters of the global seismicity, I, in: Computational and Statistical Methods of Seismic Data Interpretation, edited by: Keilis-Borok, V. I., 44&amp;ndash;66, Nauka, Moscow, 1973. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Narkunskaya, G. S. and Shnirman, M. G.: On an algorithm of earthquake prediction, in: Computational Seismology and Geodynamics, Vol. 1, edited by: Chowdhury, D. K., 20&amp;ndash;24, AGU, Washington, D.C., 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Nur, A. and Booker, J. R.: Aftershocks caused by pore fluid flow?, Science, 175, 885&amp;ndash;887, 1972. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Ogata, Y., and Katsura, K.: Analysis of temporal and spatial heterogeneity of magnitude frequency distribution inferred from earthquake catalogues, Geophys. J. Int., 113, 727&amp;ndash;738, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Olami, Z., Feder, H. J. S., and Christensen, K.: Self-organized criticality in a continuous, nonconservative cellular automaton modeling earthquakes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 1244&amp;ndash;1247, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Robinson, R. and Benites, R.: Synthetic seismicity models for the Wellington region, New Zeland: Implications for temporal distribution of large events, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 27 833&amp;ndash;27 844, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text"> Robinson, R. and Benites, R.: Upgrading a synthetic seismicity model for more realistic fault ruptures, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1843&amp;ndash;1846, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="39" content_type="text"> Rotwain, I., Keilis-Borok, V., and Botvina, L.: Premonitory transformation of steel fracturing and seismicity, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 101, 61&amp;ndash;71, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="40" content_type="text"> SCEDC: web site http://www.data.scec.org/about/data_avail.html. </reference>
		<reference numeration="41" content_type="text"> Smith, W. D.: Evidence for precursory changes in the frequency-magnitude $b$-value, Geophys. J. Int., 86, 815&amp;ndash;838, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="42" content_type="text"> Soloviev, A. and Ismail-Zadeh, A.: Models of dynamics of block-and-fault systems, in: Nonlinear Dynamics of the Lithosphere and Earthquake Prediction, edited by: Keilis-Borok, V. I. and Soloviev, A. A., 71&amp;ndash;139, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="43" content_type="text"> Utsu, T. and Seki, A.: A relation between the area of aftershock region and the energy of main shock, J. Seism. Soc. Japan, 7, 233&amp;ndash;240, 1954. </reference>
		<reference numeration="44" content_type="text"> Ward, S. N.: An application of synthetic seismicity in earthquake statistics: The Middle America Trench, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 6675&amp;ndash;6682, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="45" content_type="text"> Ward, S. N.: San Francisco Bay Area earthquake simulation: A step toward a standard physical earthquake model, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 90, 370&amp;ndash;386, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="46" content_type="text"> Wiemer, S. and Wyss, M.: Mapping the frequency-magnitude distribution in asperities: An improved technique to calculate recurrence times?, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 15 115&amp;ndash;15 128, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="47" content_type="text"> Wyss, M., Schorlemmer, D., and Wiemer, S.: Mapping asperities by minima of local recurrence time: San Jacinto-Elsinore fault zones, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 7829&amp;ndash;7844, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="48" content_type="text"> Wyss, M. and Wiemer, S.: Change in the probability for earthquakes in Southern California due to the Landers magnitude 7.3 earthquake, Science, 290, 1334&amp;ndash;1338, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="49" content_type="text"> Zaliapin, I., Keilis-Borok, V., and Ghil, M.: A Boolean delay model of colliding cascades. II: Prediction of critical transitions, J. Stat. Phys., 111, 839&amp;ndash;861, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="50" content_type="text"> Zhou, S., Johnston, S., Robinson, R., and Vere-Jones, D.: Tests of the precursory accelerating moment release model using a synthetic seismicity model for Wellington, New Zealand, J. Geophys. Res., 111, B05308, doi:10.1029/2005JB003720, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="51" content_type="text"> Zöller, G., Hainzl, S., Holschneider, M., and Ben-Zion, Y.: Aftershocks resulting from creeping sections in a heterogeneous fault, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L03308, doi:10.1029/2004GL021871, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="52" content_type="text"> Zöller, G., Hainzl, S., Ben-Zion, Y., and Holschneider, M.: Earthquake activity related to seismic cycles in a model for a heterogeneous strike-slip fault, Tectonophysics, 423, 137&amp;ndash;145, 2006. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

