Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net 1023-5809 1607-7946 15 1 2008 10.5194/npg-15-53-2008 http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/15/53/2008/ http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/15/53/2008/npg-15-53-2008.html http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/15/53/2008/npg-15-53-2008.pdf 53 59 2008-02-05 The influence of solar wind turbulence on geomagnetic activity D. Jankovičovà dja@ufa.cas.cz Z. Vörös J. Šimkanin Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Science, Graz, Austria Geophysical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic The importance of space weather and its forecasting is growing as interest in studying geoeffective processes in the Sun – solar wind – magnetosphere – ionosphere coupled system is increasing. In this paper higher order statistical moments of interplanetary magnetic field and geomagnetic SYM-H index fluctuations are compared. The proper description of fluctuations in the solar wind can elucidate important aspects of the geoeffectivity of upstream turbulence and contribute to our understanding of space weather. Our results indicate that quasi-stationary intervals during both quiet and stormy periods have to be investigated in order to find correlations between upstream and geomagnetic conditions. We found that the fourth statistical moment (kurtosis), which was not considered in previous studies, appears to be a new geoeffective parameter. Intermittency of the magnetic turbulence in the solar wind can influence the efficiency of the solar wind – magnetosphere coupling through affecting magnetic reconnection at the Earth's magnetopause. Baker, D. N., Pulkkinen, T. I., Angelopoulos, V., Baumjohann, W., and McPherron, R. L.: The neutral line model of substorms: Past results and present view, J. Geophys. Res., 101(A6), 12 975–13 010, 1996. Balogh, A., Forsyth, R. J., Lucek, E. A., Horbury, T. S., and Smith, E. J.: Heliospheric magnetic field polarity inversions at high heliographic latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 631–634, 1999. Bavassano, B., Woo, R., and Bruno, R.: Heliospheric plasma sheet and coronal streamers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 1655–1658, 1997. % %Belcher, J. W. and Davis, L.: Large-amplitude Alfvén waves in the interplanetary medium, %J. Geophys. Res., 76, 3534–3563, 1971. Belcher, J. W. and Solodyna, C. V.: Alfvén waves and directional discontinuities in the interplanetary medium, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 181–186, 1975. Borovsky, J. E. and Funsten, H. O.: Role of solar wind turbulence in the coupling of the solar wind to the Earth's magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 108(A6), 1246, doi:10.1029/2002JA009601, 2003 (referred as 2003a). Borovsky, J. E. and Funsten, H. O.: MHD turbulence in the Earth's plasma sheet: Dynamics, dissipation and driving, J. Geophys. Res., 108(A7), 1284, doi:10.1029/2002JA009625, 2003 (referred as 2003b). % %Bruno, R.: Observations of MHD turbulence in the solar wind, %Il Nuovo Cimento, 20C, 881–896, 1997. % %Bruno, R., Bavassano, B., Pietropaolo, E., and Carbone, V.: %On the radial evolution of the anisotropy of solar wind fluctuations, %Solar wind Nine, Habbal, S. R., Esser, R., Hollweg, J. V., and Isenberg, P. A. (Eds.), CP471, 1999 %(referred as 1999a). % %Bruno, R., Bavassano, B., Pietropaolo, E., Carbone, V., and Veltri, P.: %Effects of intermittency on interplanetary velocity and magnetic field %fluctuations anisotropy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3185–3188, 1999 (referred as 1999b). % %Bruno, R., Carbone, V., Sorriso-Valvo, L., %and Bavassano, B.: Radial evolution of solar wind %intermittency in the inner heliosphere, %J. Geophys. Res., 108, 1130, doi:10.1029/2002JA009615, 2003. Bruno, R. and Carbone, V.: The solar wind as a turbulence laboratory, Living Rev. Solar Phys., 4, 1–186, 2005. % %Bruno, R., Bavassano, B., D'Amicis, R., Carbone, V., %Sorriso-Valvo, L., and Pietropaolo, E.: On the radial %evolution of Alfvénic turbulence in the solar wind, %Space Science Reviews, 122, 321– 328, 2006. % %Burlaga, L.: Interplanetary Magnetohydrodynamics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, %1995. % %Burlaga, L. F. and Vinas A. F.: Multiscale structure of the magnetic %field and speed at 1 AU during the declining phase of solar cycle 23 %described by a generalized Tsallis probability density function, %J. Geophys. Res., 109, A12107, doi:10.1029/2004JA010763, 2004. Burton, R. K., McPherron, R. L., and Russell, T. C.: An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst, J. Geophys. Res., 80(31), 4204–4214, 1975. Chian, A. C., Kamide, L. Y., Rempel, E. L., and Santana, W. M.: On the chaotic nature of solar-terrestrial environment: Interplanetary Alfvén intermittency, J. Geophys. Res., 111, A07S03, doi:10.1029/2005JA011396, 2006. % %Coleman, P. J.: Variations in the interplanetary magnetic field: Mariner 2, %J. Geophys. Res., 71, 5509, 1966. D'Amicis, R., Bruno, R., and Bavassano, B.: Is geomagnetic activity driven by solar wind turbulence?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L05108, doi:10.1029/2006GL028896, 2007. Forsyth, F. J., Balogh, A., Horbury, T. S. and Smith, E. J.: The heliospheric magnetic field at solar minimum as observed by ULYSSES, Adv. Space Res., 19, 839–842, 1997. Forsyth, B. and Breen, A.: The 3D Sun and heliosphere at solar maximum, meeting report, Astron. Geophys., 43(3), p 3.32., doi:10.1046/j.1468-4004.2002.43332.x, 2002. Frisch, U.: Turbulence: The legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; New York, USA, 1995. % %Goldstein, M. and Roberts, D.: Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in the solar wind, %Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrphys., 33, 283–325, 1995. Horbury, T. S. and Tsurutani, B.: Ulysses measurements of waves, turbulence and discontinuities, in: The Heliosphere Near Solar Minimum: The Ulysses perspective, edited by: Balogh, A., Marsden, R. G., and Smith, E. J., Springer-Praxis Books in Astrophysics and Astronomy, Springer, London, UK; New York, USA, 167–227, 2001. Jankovičová, D., Dolinsk\'y, P., Valach, F., and Vörös, Z.: Neural network based nonlinear prediction of magnetic storms, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 64, 651–656, 2002. % %Lazarian, A., Petrosian, V., Yan, H., and Cho, J.: Physics of gamma-ray bursts, turbulence, %energy transfer and reconnection, School/Conference on Beaming and Jets in Gamma Ray Bursts (NBSI), %Copenhagen, August 2002, Ouyed, R. (Ed.), 45, 2003. O'Brien, T. P. and McPherron, R. L.: An empirical phase space analysis of ring current dynamics: Solar wind control of injection and decay, J. Geophys. Res., 105(A4), 7707–7719, 2000. Oughton, S., Transport of solar wind fluctuations: A turbulence approach, PhD Thesis, Delaware University, Wilmington, USA, 1993. % %Roberts, D., Klein, L., Goldstein, M., and Matthaeus, W.: %The nature and evolution of magnetohydrodynamic fluctuations in the solar wind: %Voyager observations, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 11021–11040, 1987. Sorriso-Valvo, L., Carbone, V., Veltri, P., Consolini, G., and Bruno, R.: Intermittency in the solar wind turbulence through probability distribution functions of fluctuations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1801–1804, 1999. % %Sorriso-Valvo, L., Carbone, V., Giuliani, P., Veltri, P., Bruno, R., Antoni, V., %and Martines, E.: Intermittency in plasma turbulence, Planet. Space Sci., 49, 1193–1200, %2001. Tu, C. Y. and Marsch, E.: MHD structures, waves and turbulence in the solar wind: observations and theories, Space Sci. Rev., 73, 1–210, 1995. Vassiliadis, D., Sharma, A. S., and Papadopoulos, K.: An empirical model relating the auroral geomagnetic activity to the interplanetary magnetic field, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 1731–1734, 1993. Vörös, Z. and Jankovičová, D.: Neural network prediction of geomagnetic activity: a method using local Hölder exponent, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 9, 425–433, 2002. Zank, G. P. and Matthaeus, W. H.: Waves and turbulence in the solar wind, J.Geophys. Res., 97, 17189–17194, 1992. Zweben, S. J., Manyuk, C. R. and Taylor, R. J.: Small-Scale Magnetic Fluctuations Inside the Macrotor Tokamak, Phys. Rev. Lett., 42, p 1720, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.1720.3, 1979.