<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/inc/npg/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Nonlinear Processes  in Geophysics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1023-5809</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7946</eissn>
		<volume_number>17</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2010</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/npg-17-77-2010</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/17/77/2010/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/17/77/2010/npg-17-77-2010.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/17/77/2010/npg-17-77-2010.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>77</start_page>
	<end_page>84</end_page>
	<publication_date>2010-02-12</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Shannon information of the geomagnetic field for the past 7000 years</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>A. De Santis</name>
			<email>angelo.desantis@ingv.it</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1,3">
			<name>E. Qamili</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Roma, Italy</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Facoltà di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali, Università degli Studi &quot;G. D&apos;Annunzio&quot;, Chieti, Italy</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Scuola di dottorato in Scienze Polari, Università degli studi di Siena, Siena, Italy</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The present behaviour of the geomagnetic field as expressed by the
International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) deserves special attention
when compared with that shown over the past few thousands of years by two
paleomagnetic/archeomagnetic models, CALS3K and CALS7K. The application of
the Information theory in terms of Shannon Information and K-entropy to these
models shows characteristics of an instable geomagnetic field. Although the
result is mitigated when we correct the CALS7K model for its typical spectral
damping, the present geomagnetic field as represented by IGRF is still rather
distinct, at least for the past 4000 years, a result that is further
confirmed by the CALS3K model. This is consistent with a significant global
critical state started at around 1750, and still present, characterised by
significant decays of the geomagnetic dipole, energy and Shannon information
and high K-entropy. The details of how these characteristics may develop are
not clear, since the present state could move toward an excursion or a
geomagnetic polarity reversal, but we cannot exclude the possibility that the
&quot;critical&quot; behaviour will become again more &quot;normal&quot;, stopping the
apparent trend of the recent geomagnetic field decay.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Baranger, M., Latora, V., and Rapisarda, A.: Time evolution of thermodynamic entropy for conservative and dissipative chaotic maps, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 13, 471–478, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Beck, C. and Schlögl, F.: Thermodynamics of Chaotic Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 306~pp., 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Buchner, T. and Zebrowski, J.: Local entropies as a measure of ordering in discrete maps, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 9(1/2), 19–28, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Constable, C. G. and Korte, M.: Is Earth&apos;s magnetic field reversing?, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 246, 1–16, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> De Santis, A.: How persistent is the present trend of the geomagnetic field to decay and, possibly, to reverse?, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 162, 217–226, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> De Santis, A.: Erratum to &quot;How persistent is the present trend of the geomagnetic field to decay and, possibly, to reverse?&quot;, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 170, p 149, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> De Santis, A.: Geosystemics, Proceedings of WSEAS Conference on Geology and Seismology GES &apos;09, Cambridge, 36–40, February 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> De Santis, A. and Qamili, E.: Equivalent Monopole Source of the Geomagnetic South Atlantic Anomaly, Pure Appl. Geophys., in press, 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> De Santis, A., Falcone, C., and Lowes, F. J.: Remarks on the mean-square values of the geomagnetic field and its components, Ann. Geofis., 38(2), 167–173, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> De Santis, A., Tozzi, R., and Gaya-Piquè, L. R.: Information Content and K-entropy of the Present Geomagnetic Field, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 218, 269–275, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Eckmann, J.-P. and Ruelle, D.: Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors, Part I, Rev. Mod. Phys., 57(0.3), 617–654, 1985. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Ferraro, M., Boccignone, G., and Caelli, T.: Entropy-based representation of image information, Pattern Recogn. Lett., 23(12), 1391–1398, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Gubbins, D.: Mechanism for geomagnetic polarity reversals, Nature, 326, 167–169, 1987. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Gubbins, D.: Geomagnetic polarity reversals: a connection with secular variation and core-mantle interaction?, Rev. Geophys., 32(1), 61–83, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Gubbins, D., Jones, A. L., and Finlay, C. C.: Fall in Earth&apos;s Magnetic Field is erratic, Science, 312, 900–902, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Holme, R. and Olsen, N.: The spectrum of the magnetic secular variation, in; Earth Observation with CHAMP, edited by: Reigber, C., Luhr, H., Schwintzer, P., and Wickert, J., Springer, New York, 329–334, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Hulot, G., Eymin, C., Langlais, B., Mandea, M., and Olsen, N.: Small-scale structure of the geodynamo inferred from Øersted and Magsat satellite data, Nature, 416, 620–623, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Jackson, A., Jonkers, A. R. T., and Walker, M. R.: Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records, Philos. T. Roy. Soc A, 358, 957–990, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Jacobs, J. A.: Reversals of the Earth&apos;s Magnetic Field, 2nd edn., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 366~pp., 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Jernigan, M. E. and D&apos;Astous, F.: Entropy-based texture analysis in the spectral frequency domain, IEEE T. Pattern Anal., PAMI-6(2), 237–243, 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Korte, M. and Constable, C. G.: Continuous geomagnetic field models for the past 7 millennia: 2. CALS7K, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 6, Q02H16, doi:10.1029/2004GC000801, 2005a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Korte, M. and Constable, C. G.: The geomagnetic dipole moment over the last 7000 years – new results from a global model, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 236, 348–358, 2005b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Korte, M. and Constable, C. G.: Centennial and millennial geomagnetic secular variation, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 43–52, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Korte, M., Donadini, F., and Constable, C. G.: Geomagnetic field for 0–3 ka: 2. A new series of time-varying global models, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 10, Q06008, doi:10.1029/2008GC002297, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Leonhardt, R. and Fabian, K.: Geomagnetic variation during the past 5000 years: A global reconstruction, IUGG XXIV General Assembly, Perugia, Italy, poster presentation 2554, ASI003, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Lowes, F. J.: Mean-square values on sphere of spherical harmonic vector fields, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 2179, 1966. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Lowes, F. J.: Spatial power spectrum of the main geomagnetic field, and extrapolation to the core, Geophys. J. Int., 36, 717–730, 1974. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Lowes, F. J.: An estimate of the errors of the IGRF/DGRF fields 1945–2000, Earth Planets Space, 52, 1207–1211, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Macmillan, S. and Maus, S.: International Geomagnetic Reference Field – the tenth generation, Earth Planets Space, 57, 1135–1140, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Majewski, E.: Thermodynamics of Chaos and Fractals applied: Evolution of the Earth and Phase Transformations, in: Earthquake Thermodynamics and Phase Transformations in the Earth&apos;s Interior, edited by: Teisseyre, R. and Majewski, E., 25–80, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Olsen, N. and Mandea, M.: Rapidly changing flows in the Earth&apos;s core, Nature Geoscience, 1, 390–394, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Rodr\`&amp;#x0131;guez-Iturbe, I., D&apos;Odorico, P., and Rinaldo, A.: Configuration entropy of fractal landscapes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25(7), 1015–1018, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Ryzhikov, G., Biryulina, M., and Hanyga, A.: 3D nonlinear inversion by entropy of image contrast optimization, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 2, 228–240, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Schuster, H. G.: Deterministic Chaos, VCH, Weinheim, 291~pp., 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Shannon, C.: A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656, 1948. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Wales, D. J.: Calculating the rate of loss of information from chaotic time series by forecasting, Nature, 350, 485–488, 1991.  </reference>
	</references>
</article>

