<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/inc/npg/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Nonlinear Processes  in Geophysics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1023-5809</issn>
		<eissn>1607-7946</eissn>
		<volume_number>9</volume_number>
		<issue_number>5/6</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2002</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/npg-9-497-2002</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/9/497/2002/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/9/497/2002/npg-9-497-2002.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/9/497/2002/npg-9-497-2002.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>497</start_page>
	<end_page>512</end_page>
	<publication_date>0000-00-00</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">On the problem of optimal approximation of the four-wave kinetic integral</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>V. G. Polnikov</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>L. Farina</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Centro de Previsão de Tempo e Estudos Climáticos (CPTEC), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), CPTEC/INPE, Cachoeira Paulista, SP, 12630-000, Brazil</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">permanent address: The State Oceanographic Institute, Moscow, Russia</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The problem of
      optimization of analytical and numerical approximations of Hasselmann&apos;s
      nonlinear kinetic integral is discussed in general form. Considering the
      general expression for the kinetic integral, a principle to obtain the
      optimal approximation is formulated. From this consideration it follows
      that the most well-accepted approximations, such as Discrete Interaction
      Approximation (DIA) (Hasselmann et al., 1985), Reduced Integration
      Approximation (RIA) (Lin and Perry, 1999), and the Diffusion Approximation
      proposed recently in Zakharov and Pushkarev (1999) (ZPA), have the same
      roots. The only difference among them is, essentially, the choice of the
      4-wave configuration for the interacting waves. To evaluate a quality of
      any approximation for the 2-D nonlinear energy transfer, a mathematical
      measure of relative error is constructed and the meaning of approximation
      efficiency is postulated. By the use of these features it is shown that
      DIA has better accuracy and efficiency than ZPA. Following to the general
      idea of optimal approximation and by using the measures introduced, more
      efficient and faster versions of DIA are proposed.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

