Articles | Volume 25, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-355-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-355-2018
Research article
 | 
03 May 2018
Research article |  | 03 May 2018

Feature-based data assimilation in geophysics

Matthias Morzfeld, Jesse Adams, Spencer Lunderman, and Rafael Orozco

Related authors

A comprehensive model for the kyr and Myr timescales of Earth's axial magnetic dipole field
Matthias Morzfeld and Bruce A. Buffett
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 26, 123–142, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-123-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-26-123-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Predictability, probabilistic forecasts, data assimilation, inverse problems | Topic: Climate, atmosphere, ocean, hydrology, cryosphere, biosphere
A range of outcomes: the combined effects of internal variability and anthropogenic forcing on regional climate trends over Europe
Clara Deser and Adam S. Phillips
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 63–84, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-63-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-63-2023, 2023
Short summary
Extending ensemble Kalman filter algorithms to assimilate observations with an unknown time offset
Elia Gorokhovsky and Jeffrey L. Anderson
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 37–47, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-37-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-37-2023, 2023
Short summary
Guidance on how to improve vertical covariance localization based on a 1000-member ensemble
Tobias Necker, David Hinger, Philipp Johannes Griewank, Takemasa Miyoshi, and Martin Weissmann
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 13–29, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-13-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-13-2023, 2023
Short summary
Weather pattern dynamics over western Europe under climate change: predictability, information entropy and production
Stéphane Vannitsem
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 30, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-1-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-30-1-2023, 2023
Short summary
Using a hybrid optimal interpolation–ensemble Kalman filter for the Canadian Precipitation Analysis
Dikraa Khedhaouiria, Stéphane Bélair, Vincent Fortin, Guy Roy, and Franck Lespinas
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 29, 329–344, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-329-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-29-329-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Agapiou, S., Papaspiliopoulos, O., Sanz-Alonso, D., and Stuart, A.: Importance sampling: computational complexity and intrinsic dimension, Stat. Sci., 32, 405–431, 2017. a, b, c
Arulampalam, M., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., and Clapp, T.: A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking, IEEE T. Signal Proces., 50, 174–188, 2002. a
Atkins, E., Morzfeld, M., and Chorin, A.: Implicit particle methods and their connection with variational data assimilation, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 1786–1803, 2013. a
Bauer, P., Thorpe, A., and Brunet, G.: The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction, Nature, 252, 45–55, 2015. a
Bishop, C.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, 2006. a
Download
Short summary
Many applications in science require that computational models and data be combined. In a Bayesian framework, this is usually done by defining likelihoods based on the mismatch of model outputs and data. However, matching model outputs and data in this way can be unnecessary or impossible. This issue can be addressed by selecting features of the data, and defining likelihoods based on the features, rather than by the usual mismatch of model output and data.