Journal cover Journal topic
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.129 IF 1.129
  • IF 5-year value: 1.519 IF 5-year 1.519
  • CiteScore value: 1.54 CiteScore 1.54
  • SNIP value: 0.798 SNIP 0.798
  • SJR value: 0.610 SJR 0.610
  • IPP value: 1.41 IPP 1.41
  • h5-index value: 21 h5-index 21
  • Scimago H index value: 48 Scimago H index 48
Volume 25, issue 4 | Copyright

Special issue: Numerical modeling, predictability and data assimilation in...

Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 25, 765-807, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-765-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Review article 12 Nov 2018

Review article | 12 Nov 2018

Review article: Comparison of local particle filters and new implementations

Alban Farchi and Marc Bocquet Alban Farchi and Marc Bocquet
  • CEREA, joint laboratory École des Ponts Paris Tech and EDF R&D, Université Paris-Est, Champs-sur-Marne, France

Abstract. Particle filtering is a generic weighted ensemble data assimilation method based on sequential importance sampling, suited for nonlinear and non-Gaussian filtering problems. Unless the number of ensemble members scales exponentially with the problem size, particle filter (PF) algorithms experience weight degeneracy. This phenomenon is a manifestation of the curse of dimensionality that prevents the use of PF methods for high-dimensional data assimilation. The use of local analyses to counteract the curse of dimensionality was suggested early in the development of PF algorithms. However, implementing localisation in the PF is a challenge, because there is no simple and yet consistent way of gluing together locally updated particles across domains.

In this article, we review the ideas related to localisation and the PF in the geosciences. We introduce a generic and theoretical classification of local particle filter (LPF) algorithms, with an emphasis on the advantages and drawbacks of each category. Alongside the classification, we suggest practical solutions to the difficulties of local particle filtering, which lead to new implementations and improvements in the design of LPF algorithms.

The LPF algorithms are systematically tested and compared using twin experiments with the one-dimensional Lorenz 40-variables model and with a two-dimensional barotropic vorticity model. The results illustrate the advantages of using the optimal transport theory to design the local analysis. With reasonable ensemble sizes, the best LPF algorithms yield data assimilation scores comparable to those of typical ensemble Kalman filter algorithms, even for a mildly nonlinear system.

Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Short summary
Data assimilation looks for an optimal way to learn from observations of a dynamical system to improve the quality of its predictions. The goal is to filter out the noise (both observation and model noise) to retrieve the true signal. Among all possible methods, particle filters are promising; the method is fast and elegant, and it allows for a Bayesian analysis. In this review paper, we discuss implementation techniques for (local) particle filters in high-dimensional systems.
Data assimilation looks for an optimal way to learn from observations of a dynamical system to...
Citation
Share