Asch, M., Bocquet, M., and Nodet, M.: Data assimilation: methods, algorithms
and applications, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2017. a

Bärenzung, J., Holschneider, M., Wicht, J., Sanchez, S., and Lesur, V.:
Modeling and Predicting the Short-Term Evolution of the Geomagnetic Field,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 123, 4539–4560,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JB015115, 2018. a

Buffett, B.: Dipole fluctuations and the duration of geomagnetic polarity
transitions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7444–7451, 2015. a

Buffett, B. and Davis, W.: A Probabilistic Assessment of the Next Geomagnetic
Reversal, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 1845–1850,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077061, 2018. a

Buffett, B. and Matsui, H.: A power spectrum for the geomagnetic dipole moment,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 411, 20–26, 2015. a, b, c, d

Buffett, B. and Puranam, A.: Constructing stochastic models for dipole
fluctuations from paleomagnetic observations, Phys. Earth
Planet. In., 272, 68–77, 2017. a, b, c, d

Buffett, B., Ziegler, L., and Constable, C.: A stochastic model for
paleomagnetic field variations, Geophys. J. Int., 195,
86–97, 2013. a, b, c, d

Buffett, B. A., King, E. M., and Matsui, H.: A physical interpretation of
stochastic models for fluctuations in the Earth's dipole field, Geophys. J. Int., 198, 597–608, 2014. a

Cande, S. and Kent, D.: Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity
timescale for the late Cretaceous and Cenozoic, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 100, 6093–6095, 1995. a, b, c

Chorin, A. and Hald, O.: Stochastic tools in mathematics and science, Springer, New York,
third edn., 2013. a

Constable, C. and Johnson, C.: A paleomagnetic power spectrum, Phys. Earth
Planet. In., 153, 61–73, 2005. a, b, c

Constable, C., Korte, M., and Panovska, S.: Persistent high paleosecular
variation activity in southern hemisphere for at least 10 000 years, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 453, 78–86, 2016. a, b, c, d

Finlay, C., Olsen, N., Kotsiaros, S., Gillet, N., and Lars, T.: Recent
geomagnetic secular variation from Swarm and ground observatories as
estimated in the CHAOS-6 geomagnetic field model, Earth Planets Space,
68, 1–18, 2016. a

Gissinger, C.: A new deterministic model for chaotic reversals, The European
Phys. J. B, 85, 137, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2012-20799-5, 2012. a

Goodman, J. and Weare, J.: Ensemble samplers with affine invariance, Comm. App.
Math. Com. Sc., 5, 65–80, 2010. a

Grinsted, A.: GWMCMC, https://github.com/grinsted/ (last access: 25 June 2019), 2018. a

Hoyng, P., Ossendrijver, M., and Schmitt, D.: The geodynamo as a bistable
oscillator, Geophys. Astro. Fluid, 94, 263–314, 2001. a, b

Hoyng, P., Schmitt, D., and Ossendrijver, M.: A theoretical analysis of the
observed variability of the geomagnetic dipole field, Phys. Earth
Planet. In., 130, 143–157, 2002. a, b

Hulot, G., Finlay, C. C., Constable, C. G., Olsen, N., and Mandea, M.: The
magnetic field of planet Earth, Space Sci. Rev., 152, 159–222, 2010. a

Lowrie, W. and Kent, D.: Geomagnetic polarity time scale and reversal frequency
regimes, Geoph. Monog. Series, 145, 117–129, 2004. a, b

Maclean, J., Santitissadeekorn, N., and Jones, C. K.: A coherent structure
approach for parameter estimation in Lagrangian Data Assimilation, Physica D, 360, 36–45,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2017.08.007,
2017. a, b

Meduri, D. and Wicht, J.: A simple stochastic model for dipole moment
fluctuations in numerical dynamo simulations, Frontiers Earth Sci., 4, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00038,
2016.
a, b

Morzfeld, M., Fournier, A., and Hulot, G.: Coarse predictions of dipole
reversals by low-dimensional modeling and data assimilation, Phys.
Earth Planet. In., 262, 8–27,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2016.10.007,
2017. a

Morzfeld, M., Adams, J., Lunderman, S., and Orozco, R.: Feature-based data assimilation in geophysics, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 25, 355–374, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-355-2018, 2018. a, b, c

Ogg, J.: Geomagnetic polarity time scale, in: The geological time scale 2012,
edited by: Gradstein, F., Ogg, J., Schmitz, M., and Ogg, G., chap. 5, pp.
85–1130, Elsevier Science, Boston, 2012. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i

Pétrélis, F. and Fauve, S.: Chaotic dynamics of the magnetic field
generated by dynamo action in a turbulent flow, J. Phys.-Condensed
Matter, 20, 494203, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/20/49/494203, 2008. a

Pétrélis, F., Fauve, S., Dormy, E., and Valet, J.-P.: Simple mechanism for
reversals of Earth's magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett., 102,
144503, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.144503, 2009. a

Pourovskii, L., Mravlje, J., Georges, A., Simak, S., and Abrikosov, I.:
Electron-electron scattering and thermal conductivity of epsilon-iron at
Earth's core conditions, New J. Phys., 19, 073022, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa76c9, 2017. a

Reich, S. and Cotter, C.: Probabilistic Forecasting and Bayesian Data
Assimilation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015. a

Rikitake, T.: Oscillations of a system of disk dynamos, Math.
Proc. Cambridge, 54, 89–105, 1958. a

Risken, H.: The Fokker-Planck equation: Methods of solution and applications,
Springer, Berlin, 1996. a

Roberts, A. and Winkhofer, M.: Why are geomagnetic excursions not always
recorded in sediments? Constraints from post-depositional remanent
magnetization lock-in modeling, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 227,
345–359, 2004. a, b

Schmitt, D., Ossendrijver, M., and Hoyng, P.: Magnetic field reversals and
secular variation in a bistable geodynamo model, Phys. Earth
Planet. In., 125, 119–124, 2001. a, b

Valet, J.-P., Meynadier, L., and Guyodo, Y.: Geomagnetic field strength and
reversal rate over the past 2 million years, Nature, 435, 802–805, 2005. a, b, c

Wolff, U.: Monte Carlo errors with less errors, Comput. Phys. Commun., 156,
143–153, 2004. a

Ziegler, L., Constable, C., and Johnson, C.: Testing the robustness and
limitations of 0-1 Ma absolute paleointensity data, Phys. Earth
Planet. In., 170, 34–45, 2008. a

Ziegler, L. B., Constable, C. G., Johnson, C. L., and Tauxe, L.: PADM2M: a
penalized maximum likelihood model of the 0–2 Ma paleomagnetic axial dipole
model, Geophys. J. Int., 184, 1069–1089, 2011. a, b, c, d, e