DeVries, P. M. R., Viégas, F., Wattenberg, M., and Meade, B. J.: Deep
Learning of Aftershock Patterns Following Large Earthquakes, Nature, 560,
632–634,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0438-y, 2018.
a
Field, E. H. and Milner, K. R.: Candidate Products for Operational
Earthquake Forecasting Illustrated Using the HayWired Planning
Scenario, Including One Very Quick (and Not-So-Dirty)
Hazard-Map Option, Seismol. Res. Lett., 89, 1420–1434,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170241, 2018.
a
Gerstenberger, M. C., Wiemer, S., Jones, L. M., and Reasenberg, P. A.:
Real-Time Forecasts of Tomorrow's Earthquakes in California, Nature, 435,
328–331,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03622, 2005.
a
GNU: GPLv3, available at:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html (last access: 1 March 2019), 2018. a
Gu, C., Schumann, A. Y., Baiesi, M., and Davidsen, J.: Triggering Cascades and
Statistical Properties of Aftershocks, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol.
Ea., 118, 4278–4295,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50306, 2013.
a
Hainzl, S., Moradpour, J., and Davidsen, J.: Static Stress Triggering Explains
the Empirical Aftershock Distance Decay, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,
8818–8824,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061975, 2014.
a
Hauksson, E., Yang, W., and Shearer, P. M.: Waveform Relocated Earthquake
Catalog for Southern California (1981 to June 2011) Short Note,
B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 102, 2239–2244,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120010,
2012.
a,
b
Hawkes, A. G.: Point Spectra of Some Mutually Exciting Point Processes,
J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 33,
438–443, 1971. a
Helmstetter, A., Kagan, Y. Y., and Jackson, D. D.: Comparison of
Short-Term and Time-Independent Earthquake Forecast Models
for Southern California, B. Seismol. Soc.
Am., 96, 90–106,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050067, 2006.
a,
b
Holliday, J. R., Chen, C.-C., Tiampo, K. F., Rundle, J. B., Turcotte, D. L.,
and Donnellan, A.: A RELM Earthquake Forecast Based on Pattern
Informatics, Seismol. Res. Lett., 78, 87–93,
https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.78.1.87, 2007.
a
Kagan, Y. Y.: Short-Term Properties of Earthquake Catalogs and
Models of Earthquake Source, B. Seismol. Soc.
Am., 94, 1207–1228,
https://doi.org/10.1785/012003098, 2004.
a
Lippiello, E., Bottiglieri, M., Godano, C., and de Arcangelis, L.: Dynamical
Scaling and Generalized Omori Law, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
23,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030963, 2007a.
a,
b,
c
Lippiello, E., Godano, C., and de Arcangelis, L.: Dynamical Scaling in
Branching Models for Seismicity, Phys. Rev. Lett., 98,
098501,
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.098501, 2007b.
a,
b
Lippiello, E., de Arcangelis, L., and Godano, C.: Influence of Time and
Space Correlations on Earthquake Magnitude, Phys. Rev. Lett.,
100, 038501,
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.038501, 2008.
a,
b,
c,
d
Michael, A. J. and Werner, M. J.: Preface to the Focus Section on the
Collaboratory for the
Study of Earthquake Predictability
2CSEP169New Results(CSEPFuture Directions, Seismol. Res.
Lett., 89, 1226–1228,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180161, 2018.
a
Mogi, K.: Experimental Rock Mechanics, Taylor & Francis, London, New York,
2007. a
Moradpour, J., Hainzl, S., and Davidsen, J.: Nontrivial Decay of Aftershock
Density with Distance in Southern California, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 119, 5518–5535,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB010940, 2014.
a,
b,
c
Moschetti, M. P., Luco, N., Frankel, A. D., Petersen, M. D., Aagaard, B. T.,
Baltay, A. S., Blanpied, M. L., Boyd, O. S., Briggs, R. W., Gold, R. D.,
Graves, R. W., Hartzell, S. H., Rezaeian, S., Stephenson, W. J., Wald, D. J.,
Williams, R. A., and Withers, K. B.: Integrate Urban-Scale Seismic
Hazard Analyses with the U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model,
Seismol. Res. Lett., 89, 967–970,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170261, 2018.
a
Omori, F.: On the Aftershocks of Earthquakes, Journal of the College of
Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, 7, 111–120, 1894. a
Peng, Z., Vidale, J. E., Ishii, M., and Helmstetter, A.: Seismicity Rate
Immediately before and after Main Shock Rupture from High-frequency Waveforms
in Japan, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 112,
B3,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004386, 2007.
a
Scholz, C. H. C. H.: The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, England, 1990. a
Schorlemmer, D., Zechar, J. D., Werner, M. J., Field, E. H., Jackson, D. D.,
Jordan, T. H., and Group, t. R. W.: First Results of the Regional
Earthquake Likelihood Models Experiment, Pure Appl. Geophys., 167,
859–876,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-010-0081-5, 2010.
a,
b
Shcherbakov, R., Turcotte, D. L., and Rundle, J. B.: A Generalized Omori's
Law for Earthquake Aftershock Decay, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31,
11,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019808, 2004.
a,
b
Shcherbakov, R., Turcotte, D. L., and Rundle, J. B.: 4.24 – Complexity and
Earthquakes, in: Treatise on Geophysics (Second Edition), edited
by: Schubert, G., Elsevier, Oxford,
627–653,
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53802-4.00094-4, 2015.
a,
b
Turcotte, D. L., Holliday, J. R., and Rundle, J. B.: BASS, an Alternative
to ETAS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 12,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029696,
2007.
a
Woessner, J., Christophersen, A., Zechar, J. D., and Monelli, D.: Building
Self-Consistent, Short-Term Earthquake Probability (STEP) Models:
Improved Strategies and Calibration Procedures, Ann. Geophys., 53,
141–154, 2010.
a,
b
Zaliapin, I. and Ben-Zion, Y.: Earthquake Clusters in Southern California
I: Identification and Stability, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol.
Ea., 118, 2847–2864,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50179, 2013.
a
Zaliapin, I., Gabrielov, A., Keilis-Borok, V., and Wong, H.: Clustering
Analysis of Seismicity and Aftershock Identification, Phys.
Rev. Lett., 101, 018501,
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.018501, 2008.
a
Zambrano Moreno, A. F.: SSAR model magnitude correlation code, catalog, and
plot data, PRISM Dataverse (University of Calgary), 1, 2,
https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/PGYQEV, 2019.
a
Zechar, J. D., Schorlemmer, D., Liukis, M., Yu, J., Euchner, F., Maechling,
P. J., and Jordan, T. H.: The Collaboratory for the Study of
Earthquake Predictability Perspective on Computational Earthquake
Science, Concurr. Comp.-Pract. E., 22,
1836–1847,
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.1519, 2010.
a,
b